๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‚๐จ๐ ๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐Ž๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐œ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐“๐ซ๐š๐ฉ

Reflections on MIT Sloanโ€™s โ€œWhatโ€™s Your Edge? Rethinking Expertise in the Age of AIโ€ (https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/whats-your-edge-rethinking-expertise-in-the-age-of-ai/)

A segment from the recent MIT Sloan article caught my attentionโ€”it explores how reliance on digital tools can erode human capabilities. The calculator weakened mental math. GPS dulled spatial awareness. And now, as AI begins to shoulder cognitive tasks, the question is: Will it erode our ability to think critically?

As someone who grew up bridging the pre- and post-digital eras, Iโ€™ve lived this transition. My father refused to let me use a calculator, no matter how much I insisted. Ironically, when I once claimed 40 x 40 equaled 160,000, I only proved his point. He didnโ€™t need to rework my homework to spot errorsโ€”experience gave him an intuitive sense for when things were off. Thatโ€™s what the article underscores: expertise isnโ€™t just knowing howโ€”itโ€™s knowing when something doesnโ€™t add up.

Today, AI offers immense valueโ€”but we risk outsourcing not just tasks, but the thinking behind them.

That said, I also see AIโ€™s upside: freedom. Before GPS, motorcycle trips required meticulous planning. Now, I still know where I am, but I explore moreโ€”because GPS has my back when itโ€™s time to recalibrate. Iโ€™ve discovered far more by wandering than I ever did by sticking to a rigid plan.

AI offers that same freedom in my professional life. As a senior leader, much of my time is consumed by operational demands. But AI is starting to shift that balanceโ€”automating the routine so I can refocus on strategic thinking, creativity, and the higher-value work leadership requires.

The trap isnโ€™t the toolโ€”itโ€™s forgetting to keep our edge sharp while using it.